requestId:68499aba296714.49725603.
Xing Bing’s “Commentary on Filial Piety” was examined
Author: Chen Bisheng (China National Academy of Nationalities)
Source: “Classic Research” (Danbi Hong Kong) Spring Volume 2016 (Issue 21)
Time: Confucius was the first day of the seventh month of the Wuxu period in the year 2569, Yihai
Jesus August 11, 2018
【Summary】 “The Notes on Filial Piety” was written by Xing Bing of the Northern Song Dynasty, but Teacher Chen Dungsen pointed out that his books were mostly written by the officials of the Tianbao courtesan, and most of the officials of the Tianbao courtesan were distracted from the Yuan Dynasty during the Yuan Dynasty. In this summary 2: In the future, since the new Emperor’s “Filial Piety Commentary” was published in Dunhuang, Japan (Japan) has newly discovered Liu Xuan’s “Filial Piety Commentary”. Through the review of the articles, we can see that many of the memorials in “Filial Piety Commentary” were written by Liu Xuan and Liu Xuan’s “Filial Piety Commentary”. Since Huang Kan and Liu Xuan’s books were lost in the Northern Song Dynasty, it can be proved that the “Commentary on Filial Piety” is indeed a commentary on the Tang Dynasty along the way. Xing Bing’s CP (character matching) led the discussion of fans. He said that his memorial was “Jian Jieyuan’s “Shu””. From the topic of “Preface to Filial Piety”, the memorial text can be used to examine the traces of the so-called “Jian Jieyuan’s “Shu””. At the same time, the book “Notes and Commentary” sometimes follows Liu Xuan’s statement, saying that “Filial Piety” is a dialogue between Confucius and Zeng Zi, and sometimes he believes that Confucius and Zeng Zi have a conversation. This confession that Xing Bing’s proofreading was at a stalemate between the Tang Dynasty’s “Notes and Commentary” and its own position, which made this “Notes and Commentary” appear at the point of conflict. From the various traces, you can see the book “Filial Piety Notes” in “Sweetheart Garden”.
In the “Thirteen Notes and Comments”, the “Zheng Yi” defined by the Tang Dynasty, although the annotations of the Nine Words are divided into superiority and inferiority, their meanings can retain the old meanings of the Six Dynasties and be broad and comprehensive. The four commentaries of “Filial Piety”, “Speech”, “Mencius” and “Lya” that were established in the early Song Dynasty were far from the broadest scope of the Jiujiu’s righteousness. Xing Bing compiled the “Commentary on Filial Piety” and was particularly important. The main reasons for the “Commentary on Filial Piety” today are a description of the review of Ruan Phuc and Chen Fengsen’s examination.The results were: 2. The Emperor’s “Filial Piety Commentary” was written by Liu Xuan’s “Filial Piety Commentary”, and the author of the “Filial Piety Commentary” and the misunderstanding of the Yuan Shu; 3. The Emperor’s “Filial Piety Commentary” was examined by Xing Bing, and the many “Filial Piety Commentary” after Xing Chuang’s “Filial Piety Commentary” were contradictory. This can help those who read this “Filial Piety Notes and Commentaries” to understand the truth.
1. Questions of the author of “The Notes on Filial Piety”
“The Notes on Filial Piety”, written by Xing Bing. Xing Bing’s Preface says: “The “Filial Piety” is the essence of the hundred principles and the key to the five religions. Since Confucius’s writings, he has set an example and made a subtle statement of the subject and the subtle explanation of the subject. He is still interpreted with high orders and far-reaching, but later studies have difficulty in sacrificing theories. Now he has specially slashed the Yuan Dynasty’s “Shu” and quoted the books next to them, which are divided into misunderstandings, which are in line with the interests of the subject. Once he explains the order, he explains the meaning of the number.” [1] According to this preface, it seems that Xing Bing used the Yuan Xingyu “Commentary” as the blue version, and added some explanations, and wrote the “Commentary on Filial Piety”. The library minister of “Four Library” said this. “Four Custody” summarized the “Filial Piety” commentary on the annotation of Emperor Xuanzong of Tang, the Yuan Xingyu Commentary, and the Xing Bing Commentary:
The case “Tang Hui Yao Commentary”: “In June of the tenth year of the Yuan Dynasty, the “Filial Piety Commentary” was published, which was studied by the whole country and the country. In the second year of Tianbao, the “Pu Yue” was published, and the public was published, which was also published.”… “Tang Books” ·The Yuanxing Jiluo” states: “Xuanzong’s own annotation of “Filial Piety” and wrote the “Commentary” into “Commentary”, and established himself as an official.” The “Tang Huiyao” also states: “The five poems of Tianbao are written by the “Filial Piety”. Although the book “Filial Piety” is roughly invented, it is not possible to prepare. Now it is more difficult to write a broad text and ask the Jiqi Academy to write it both China and abroad.” This is the “Commentary” and the “Commentary” are also revised again. His “Commentary” and “Tang Zhi” were composed of two volumes, and the Song Zhi” was composed of three volumes, which is almost one volume added? During the Xianping period of the Song Dynasty, the “Commentary” compiled by Xing Bing was written as a blue book. However, who is an old article or a new statement is no longer a distinction. [2]
In terms of literature, the notes and comments of the current version of “The Notes on Filial Piety” have been published in five stages:
1. The first comments of Emperor Minghuang of Tang Dynasty, and I saw the book “Imperial Notes on Filial Piety” in Kyoto, Japan (Japan) and Kyoto. It is the book expenditure in “Gu Yizhi’s Book”. Emperor Minghuang of Tang changed his writings and was widely used as annotations. [3]
2. Yuan Xingyu and other court officials wrote a memorial to Emperor Ming.
3. The Tang Dynasty Minghuang Tianbao period was emphasized, and the article was changed, and the article was changed. This is the content of the “Filial Piety” in the “Thirteen Notes and Comments” of the “Filial Piety”.
4. The court officials of the Tianbao Dynasty wrote a memorial to the new notes, but should be handled.
5. Xing Bing of the Northern Song Dynasty no longer knew the opening of the Yuan Dynasty. He just based on the important notes of Tianbao and diffuse, and slightly increased the number of slightest and scheduling to form books.
The specific situation was that Xuanzong wrote about “Filial Piety” in June of the tenth year of the founding year of the Yuan Dynasty, and later wrote about the Yuan Dynasty’s movement as “Commentary”. As for Pu Yue in the second year of Tianbao, Xuanzong paid close attention to “Filial Piety”, and the examination certificate of Teacher Chen Dungsen, Tianbao’s new note was more open to the old note, “only those with larger income and expenditure were eleven.” [4]ThisThe Chuyuan period has been in the past for more than ten years. The “Shu” was also reconstructed, but the review of the new two notes and reconstructed texts, “I know that the second year of Tianbao of Xuanzong’s Emperor’s reconstruction of “Filial Piety” was emphasized, but the “Filial Piety” was mainly noted in the previous chapters, and the “Filial Piety” was reconstructed by Tianbao’s five chapters, and all the old texts were still implemented, but they were slightly added to the “Yuan Notes” and filled in the “Shuozhi” in the “Zhizhi”” (same as above, page 55). Even the Emperor of Ming Dynasty changed the situation, and due to the negligence of the court officials of Tianbao, the memorial texts were not changed. [5] This is what Xing Bing saw in the “Notes on Filial Piety” of Emperor Xuanzong of Tang and the “Commentary” of Yuan Xingyu. As for Xing Bing, Nguyen Phuc wrote “Filial Piety and Yi Shu”, which detailed the revisions of Yuan Shu and Xing Shu, and the actress who used the opposite side to be the heroine of the story. In the book, the heroine uses this Yuan Dynasty to carry out the work, and Xing Bing only compiled the work. Ruan Phuc said:
XingBaoqing StoriesThe Bing Administration said, “I am punished by the orders of the memorials”, but did not politely say, “Xing
發佈留言